Видео

Way to show that a PhD in philosophy mean nothing in a debate and way to dodge every question. Then just ramble and say nothing of substance 😂

Amber is the best, she is brilliant. I would like to know where in Indiana she is from. Her best platform is with Chapo...

It's like cancer criticizing leprosy.

American is my second language

“I’m not really sure why God hardens Pharaoh’s heart. 🤔” God tells Moses that it’s to justify His impending collective punishment of the Egyptians. 😜

That was great.

40:37 - Placing military objectives near civilians is not human shielding. It's an entirely separate war crime of not taking precautions in attack to prevent civilian death. It's not as sexy a term though

39:50 - So I also see Jemt is correct. It says, Destiny is wrong. Human shielding requires specific intent. Meaning the act of placing military objectives near civilians has to be done with specific intent to prevent attack In fact, I think the, sort of, standard, you know, legal definition of the crime of human shielding is, directing the movements of civilians to protect military operations

34:39 - Lots of myths about how Israel doesn't target civilians. Or even just confusion cast about whether they _________ target civilians. And they often just make the argument themselves

27:49 - Not A Vibrant Democracy

34:00 - I think the problem with your statement ... war is hell ... factual manner ...

You should get Lance S Bush on to talk about his anti-realist position on morality.

I wonder if mark Miley has found out what white rage means yet fn loser

No surprise. Fighting racism with racism isn’t logical. The view that statistical disparity = racism is flawed at every level.

Oh hey, I live in Tijuana, you should do a talk over here.

Mao ordered getting rid of sparrows so they would not eat the crops and by so doing made the famine worse. How is that left wing?

Doc you're incredibly poorly spoken. Comparing 10 minutes limit given to you but Michael Brooks a la TMR, and taking two of your books: you should shit up and write.

Ukraine is a sovereign nation, not a pawn or a buffer zone, Mr anti-imperialist

I find Finkelstein almost impossible to listen to. He sounds as though his lungs have collapsed.

I'd really like to hear the GTTA crew engage with Modern Monetary Theory.

Hayek explained that morality, like language, is something which evolves and is selected for at the group rather than individual level. Groups where a certain, 'contingent' morality happens to appear, tend to do better than groups lacking it. This group selection - while much faster than biological evolution - is much slower than intentional human design. Now being aware obviously of the human capacity for design - and seeing the presence of design in a particular morality without a corresponding individual author - people tended to ascribe morality to a supernatural being capable of design. In this sense God is a marker, a placeholder, for the emergent, unintentional, complex, collative processes driving the production not just of morality but of an entire class of 'emergent' institutions including language, money, markets, law and so on. Since Descartes, philosophy has 'elided' this phenomenon, reducing all institutional formation to intentional individual creation. Thus in science the stubborn insistence that a particular discovery must be attributed to a particular author. In fact knowledge is produced by collective, distributed, group processes even though in the West 'discovery' in science is always attributed to the 'eccentric' individual who has somehow positioned himself ahead of, and to the side, of the consensus.

Kendi is a sausage smoker.

I think that it makes sense objective morality does not exist. Even things like murder already has context inputted into it. Even now we don't consider killing always morally wrong. So in a way Smith is right that unless there is a God that makes absolute rules then there is no objective morality.

I would love to see the guys colabed with fellow philosopher Michael Burns from wisecrack.

Can't have objective morality without god? Wouldn't Aristotle, Kant and at the very least Putnam disagree?

No state, no war is the implied conclusion in Franz Oppenheimer's 1914 book 'The State'. Oppenheimer strongly rejected the Enlightenment concept of the social contract, convincingly arguing that the State imposes itself by force rather than by the voluntary consent of the ruled. Oppenheimer tells us that the state's concern is always and only its own survival, a survival it assures through para-military means deployed against its internal population - and through military means deployed against other states.

I'm inflating my crown ben! - Notgod crowning Bertram midstream. Now that's a based take!

I wish they'd stop calling pro-life pro-life. It's actually anti-choice.

CK claims he wants strong families and limited government. Empowering families includes giving women autonomy over their bodies. But there CK wants government to step in and enforce his anit-choice nonsense. I wish they would have discussed that. I'd have loved to see Ben take anti-choice apart.

“No donor under oath has ever told me what to do 🥺” why is bro pretending like you don’t know he’s a cynical grifter lmao

‘I go head to head with him’ 😂🤣😂🤣😂 Mike Tyson v my 7 year old niece would be a fairer fight

Norm is so engrossed in his own thinking he can't hear what What Jason Myles is actually saying (at 12:30) "No no no no" and off he goes about "redistribution" and so on. Disrespectful

Nightmare on elm street 3 (Dream Warriors) was an awesome Sequel

Thank you.

Your photoshop of the thumbnail really encapsulates the intellectual calibre you represent. You wouldn't need to defame and insult if you had facts on your side.

To Ben and all his socialist acolytes. learn to be men and you wont have to come up with elaborate government interventions and welfare states. I worked at Amazon myself for 2 months, continued to better myself, and 7 years later own a million dollar moving company where i as the owner still go on every job. Want to know what my biggest obstacle is? crushing government regulations and state involvement in my business. Im sick of you sorry ass liberals who have no work ethic looking for handouts. I bust my ass every day, and so do my guys. None of them complain about being oppressed when i call them in last minute for a huge job. Grow up!

I don't know why people debate libertarianism. Libertarianism is against liberalism, communism, conservatism, anarchism, corporatism, social democracy, Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, Judaism, nationalism, paganism, fascism....IE it has no chance of ever even being tried.

It’s much better without Peretz. A lot of deadwood was cleared away under new ownership in the 2010s. Some so-so anti-Trump Dems but still some good writers like Osita Nwanevu and, uh, Jeet Heer for several years. Surprised that didn’t come up once in that really interesting interview

Conservatives of that day saying, “Even The New Republic . . . “ reminds me of Bill Maher today. What is The New Republic like these days? I only know them from a fairly recent scary article about Eric Prince’s WhatsApp group.

Jeet is great! Both of you are a wealth of knowledge and insight!! Fantastic discussion!

James is right the problem is James doesn’t have any real solutions to the problem of these fucking gnostic heretics running around

Totally get how religion is comfortable. But the same can be said of all these addictive drugs. Are we going to accept that people just do that to their death. I mean, I would like that to be the case. Even though I would like to save people if we could.

Actually Atheism does give you freedom from all that guilt. Just like how this people who search for meaning. I'm sure that are people who search for liberation from all that religious borders.

IXK was and is a sad, even tragic, figure. That he practiced his fraud for so long is an embarrassment to these gullible people. I think you could have made a much better choice of a source for your video than NF. NF's past statements about Israel and the current struggle in the Middle East make it difficult to take his opinions - even on a different subject - seriously.

Western chauvinism sounds like a mind virus to me. And the fact that people will react and call that woke is part of the virus. All ideas should be judged on their merits. Accepting a package of ideas under these sectarian labels gets us nowhere.

My plan is to watch Ben Burgis break down the discourse until Ben is a grand old man of philosophy (I’m 55 years old later this year so I am planning a long life)

The world? Small world…

Do I have to watch these two-right wing grifters? Both these extremists are paranoid.

59:00 ". . . because now they'll believe in anything." So she is a Christian as a marketing campaign? That actually would make sense if she would just admit it.

So she’s desperate to be a member of a cult that justifies her authoritarian tendencies. That’s what I heard from her words. True faith would be a belief in common humanity despite all the evidence that it does not exist.